Difference between revisions of "SBC comparison"

From xPL
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comparison)
(Comparison)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
The delay has been measured by sending a given xPL message which was parsed by the [[install central|central xPL device]]
 
The delay has been measured by sending a given xPL message which was parsed by the [[install central|central xPL device]]
on a xx lines XML rules file.
+
on a 300 lines XML rules file.
 
The parsing of the rules is quite lengthy and does not reflect the basic xPL message receiving and sending.
 
The parsing of the rules is quite lengthy and does not reflect the basic xPL message receiving and sending.
 +
Other basic xPL clients who just react on a message and send another one, such as the [[install EIB|EIB / KNX interface]] do this within 0.01 second, even on the slower computers.
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left; margin-left:50pt"  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left; margin-left:50pt"  

Revision as of 15:23, 22 May 2014

Using a service like xPL requires a computer that is always switched on. This poses the question of power consumption and speed.

Comparison

This table is under construction, values are not proper.

The power consumption has been measured with the SBC running the installed OS with no particular program running.

The delay has been measured by sending a given xPL message which was parsed by the central xPL device on a 300 lines XML rules file. The parsing of the rules is quite lengthy and does not reflect the basic xPL message receiving and sending. Other basic xPL clients who just react on a message and send another one, such as the EIB / KNX interface do this within 0.01 second, even on the slower computers.

model Processor OS power delay
BeagleBone white AM335x 720MHz ARM Cortex-A8 Ubuntu 1.5 W 3 s
BeagleBone Black AM335x 1GHz ARM® Cortex-A8 Ubuntu 1.5 W 3 s
BeagleBone Black with 7" display Ubuntu 3 W
alix1d 500 MHz AMD Geode LX Voyage 5 W 3 s
VIA ARTiGO A1000 Pico-ITX VIA C7 1GHz Ubuntu 12 W 0.1 s